The Rohrbaugh Forum

Miscellaneous => Other Guns => Topic started by: Michigunner on August 09, 2006, 07:52:24 PM

Title: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Michigunner on August 09, 2006, 07:52:24 PM
I just got a Kimber full-sized 1911 .45 Auto, after having sold my Colt Government Model years ago.

If it is cocked and locked, with a live round, how would you de-cock it?

I intend to remove the magazine, take the safety off, and rack the slide a couple of times to get the round ejected.

Then, pull the trigger, carefully following regular safety routines.

Is this how you folks would do it?

I just don't believe  in holding the hammer, and letting it go slowly forward, while pulling the trigger.

Bill
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: sslater on August 09, 2006, 09:09:08 PM
Bill,
I unload my Firestar S.A. pistol about the way you describe: drop the mag, rack the slide, rack a second time while looking in the chamber, then thumb the hammer down while while pulling the trigger.

I've seen guys thumb the hammer down on a live round.  Scary!!!  First, if the gun were to go off, kiss your thumb good bye.  Second, where is that errant round headed?  I guess first and second are tied for first.....

That Kimber you just picked up is a beautiful piece.  A friend of mine recently bought two Kimbers from Guns Galore.  He says they shoot as well as they look.

Steve
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Michigunner on August 09, 2006, 09:50:45 PM
Steve,

Thanks for telling about your procedure.   Much appreciated.  That's it then.    

My Kimber should come in tomorrow.  It is a Custom Stainless Target II.  I'm hoping to take it up north next week and try it out.

I carry the HK USP Compact .45, so the Kimber will be just for fun at the "range", really part of a National Forest set aside for informal shooting.

Bill
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: tracker on August 09, 2006, 11:02:41 PM
Have a great time shooting it, Bill.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Michigunner on August 09, 2006, 11:41:21 PM
Thank you, Sir.  Another new toy.   :)

Bill
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: theirishguard on August 09, 2006, 11:43:01 PM
Bill, enjoy yourself.
Tom
Title: Never Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Thunderbolt on August 09, 2006, 11:58:52 PM
Hey Folks,

I had to get in on this one.
Thank God, I haven't experienced an AD. and I will be very happy to never have that experience. My good friend and shooting buddy did.  :-[

Paco (alias) "doesn't feel comfortable carrying "cocked and locked" with his concealed full size 1911. He has developed his "plan" to load the chamber and then lower the hammer in order to feel safe.  ::) Well, you guessed it, he ventilated his front door and his neighbors door jam and some sheetrock  :o .
 ??? "D@*$ this mainspring is strong, this hammer sure is slick, etc., etc." :-[ Bonehead move? ....... You bet. The good part is, nobody got hurt and the neighbors and apartment management were very "understanding". Best part now is, we are both much more careful and respectful of our firearms.

I have carried "cocked and locked" in years gone by; in recent years, I feel less comfortable with it. My solution has been a Para 3" LDA carry, the R9s and last but least my P3AT. My Kimber Tactical Ultra 3" has been appropriated by my wife since I don't carry it any more; she loves it and occasionally lets me shoot it :-* . But then, she did let me buy a stainless Para full size single stack LDA.

Bill, If your new Kimber is as good as ours  8) you will never let it go. Kimbers usually take several hundred rounds to get broken in. You might want to invest in some Wilson mags. also.

Best of luck and enjoy the new Kimber,
Thunderbolt
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: flyandscuba on August 10, 2006, 12:24:59 AM
One bad habit some get into when the round doesn't eject as expected is to rack the slide back and forth rapidly in an effort to free the jam.  ADs have occured doing this with a 1911 when the ejector makes undesired contact with the primer while trying to eject the live round.

Rather than pivoting the pistol to the side and slowly racking the slide from the top with your fingers cupping the ejection port, I choose to drop the magazine and then rack the slide in normal fashion as if I've just made a mag change -- letting the live round eject and find it's way to the carpeted floor.  Then a press check is made to ensure an empty chamber prior to dropping the hammer.

An alternate procedure would be to drop the loaded magazine, replace it with a magazine containing snap caps and then rack the slide as normal -- ejecting the live round and feeding a snap cap.  Then a press check to ensure the red snap cap is in the chamber and either drop the hammer or safely dry fire (leaving the snap cap in the chamber until you again load the weapon with a magazine containing live rounds).
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Michigunner on August 10, 2006, 09:05:07 AM
Thanks for the fine tips, and well wishes.

I found a remarkable screen that shows the internal workings of the 1911.  You can even hide the slide and frame, and see the insides moving.

http://www.m1911.org/STI1911animation2.htm

Bill
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: bigyimmy on August 10, 2006, 09:44:56 AM
Great link Bill!  Thanks!
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on August 10, 2006, 10:06:06 AM
Quote
Thanks for the fine tips, and well wishes.

I found a remarkable screen that shows the internal workings of the 1911.  You can even hide the slide and frame, and see the insides moving.

http://www.m1911.org/STI1911animation2.htm

Bill

Thanks for posting that, Bill!

Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: PursuitSS on August 10, 2006, 10:44:54 AM
The only AD I've ever had was trying to lower the hammer on a Colt Gold Cup .45 acp. STUPID MOVE on my part!!!!!

If this gives you any idea how long ago this was, the round was a "fresh" Super Vel 190 gr. JHP

PursuitSS
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: riffraff on August 10, 2006, 06:34:22 PM
Just my opinion here guys.  This is 2006, no one should even consider carrying a SA as a defense gun.  DAO's are good but in the larger handguns the SA/DA with a decocker lever is the only way to go.  I don't want to upset all you die hard 1911 owners out there but they have no place in conceiled carry in this day and age.

My opinions only,  Mike
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on August 10, 2006, 06:59:00 PM
Enter the SFS System from Cylinder & Slide:

http://www.cylinder-slide.com/sfs.shtml

I have one installed in my 1911.  It works like a charm!  But I've said that before  8) :

http://www.rohrbaughforum.com/YaBB.cgi?board=Other;action=display;num=1145297620

Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: riffraff on August 10, 2006, 08:36:20 PM
Richard,

Very nice, but you still have to remember to hit the safety when you draw, is this correct?  In a split second life or death situation, the person who is not very skilled in firearms handling will forget to do anything except draw and fire.
Again my opinions only here but it doesn't matter how many improvements are made to as standard size 1911 they are just to dam big and heavy to carry conceiled, at least with the type of clothing that I normally wear most of the year.

I must admit to some bias here.  I never liked the 1911 and never will.  It is just to old school.  I don't like the way they fit my hand and I can't hit anything with one.  Now the Browning Hi-Power,  that is the finest single action ever made and in my and many other's opinion is the improvement/perfection over the 1911.

My opinions only,  Mike
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: flyandscuba on August 10, 2006, 08:50:07 PM
There is a "modern" .45 that requires essentially a cocked & locked carry mode.  The new Taurus 24/7 in SA/DA mode.  When you rack the slide and a round is chambered, the trigger is in SA mode.  The only way to get it to DA is to pull the trigger on a dead cartridge.  As soon as you eject the bad cartridge, you are back in SA mode.  Therefore, if you carry this gun, you should engage the external safety.  Of course if you take up the slack on the trigger and then engage the safety lever -- there is no safety at all -- and the gun will fire, shearing off the safety lever as the slide tries to move rearward.... :o

Yep, it is a bad design -- that they have chosen to "update" all the MillPros with...
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: tracker on August 10, 2006, 09:11:17 PM
Mike,
I like both the 1911 and the BHP but clearly am much more
partial to the BHP; although, I probably wouldn't carry either.
They are both excellent weapons, though.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: FireBreather01 on August 11, 2006, 01:36:53 AM
Quote
He has developed his "plan" to load the chamber and then lower the hammer in order to feel safe
Well, that's not the way John Browning intended it to be used, did he? I'm sorry, but that wasn't an AD, it was a ND and it wasn't due to the gun - it was due to Paco's carelessness. First, there are a couple of methods to safely lower a hammer, even on a live round :o - but you have to be comfortable and CONFIDENT with the gun, and always, always, always have a safe backstop. Second, this will only come with regular practice - if you're not willing to put the time in, especially with a 1911, then it's probably not the gun for you - get a revolver. But then again, if you choose to carry you should practice with whatever platform you're carrying. Third, if you check with almost any LEO agency that carries Glocks - guess what? Yep, a lot of AD's. I have no stats for this but I'm willing to bet that in the last decade there have been more AD's with Glocks than 1911's, especially when you consider their sheer prevalence.

An AD/ND can happen with any firearm and is almost always due to not following the rules of gun safety. I have a lot of 1911's and they're my preferred CCW (although my R9 sees the most frequent carry!). I've put thousands and thousands down range with them during training or practice, and carry one or the other whenever I can. Knock on wood - no unintentional discharges yet.
Quote
This is 2006, no one should even consider carrying a SA as a defense gun. I don't want to upset all you die hard 1911 owners out there but they have no place in conceiled carry in this day and age.

I don't understand why you're saying that. Is it liability you're concerned about? Or just the ability of the shooter to 'remember' the safety? The 1911 is a proven self-defense platform. Having a safety on has prevented more than one good guy from getting killed by his own firearm after being disarmed due to the BG not knowing to disengage the safety. They're safe, accurate, reliable, easy to carry and just plain awesome! The 1911's are thinner and more discreet than Glock, HK, Ruger, XD, etc. If you think they're too heavy, try one with an alloy frame. I have almost every pistol platform there is - SA, SA/DA, DA only, striker, etc. I still prefer a 1911. I even carry my CZ's S/A!

Okay, okay - just my opinion, I'm not trying to start another famous 1911 vs whatever thread - use what you choose, and choose to use it - regularly!!!

Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Aglifter on August 11, 2006, 05:33:08 AM
I think some of the comments may have been some "pot stirring."  1911 has one heck of a history to be disagreed with as a CCW piece.  


If you weren't holding the grip safety, would it stop the pistol from firing if the hammer did slip?
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on August 11, 2006, 07:45:57 AM
Quote
Richard,

Very nice, but you still have to remember to hit the safety when you draw, is this correct?  In a split second life or death situation, the person who is not very skilled in firearms handling will forget to do anything except draw and fire.
Again my opinions only here but it doesn't matter how many improvements are made to as standard size 1911 they are just to dam big and heavy to carry conceiled, at least with the type of clothing that I normally wear most of the year.

I must admit to some bias here.  I never liked the 1911 and never will.  It is just to old school.  I don't like the way they fit my hand and I can't hit anything with one.  Now the Browning Hi-Power,  that is the finest single action ever made and in my and many other's opinion is the improvement/perfection over the 1911.

My opinions only,  Mike

Mike:

No offense taken.  At the risk of appearing to be "politically incorrect," my experience has been that handguns are a lot like women -- what is beautiful in the eyes of one man may not be so in the eyes of another.   8)  I'm just one of those die-hard 1911 devotees and have been since being issued my first "Slabsides" 43 years ago.

I agree that the Browing High Power is a masterpiece of design.  Now the good news . . . Cylinder & Slide offers the SFS System for the High Power as well, in both blue and hard chrome.

http://www.cylinder-slide.com/sfs.shtml   (Scroll down the page.)

And speaking of the many designs by John Browning, while most of them are simply brilliant, there is one which is curious to me -- the FN Browning 1922:

http://www.cruffler.com/historic-may01.html

This is a striker-fired weapon which is an absolute "monkey puzzle" to field strip and reassemble.  Its predecessor, the 1910 model, was used in the incident which sparked the outbreak of World War I.  

http://www.gunsworld.com/world/browng1910_us.html

I own one of the 1922 models chambered for .32 ACP (7.65 mm), the markings of which indicate that it was issued to the German Luftwaffe in World War II.  Needless to say, it is now a true "Safe Queen."

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y30/RichardS/fn-browning191132acp.jpg)
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: theirishguard on August 11, 2006, 09:44:51 AM
I'm another lover of the 1911 platform for carry. In my opinion it is the best defense pistol made in .45acp. One needs to practice and think.
Tom
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Michigunner on August 11, 2006, 11:12:46 AM
I appreciate the thin width of the 1911.  That is a real blessing for those with small hands.

Not so with my Beretta 92FS Inox.  I had to tip it sideways to reach the trigger.

Well, I'm going to practice "Don't touch the M1911 hammer", when removing a live round from the chamber.

I noticed somewhere that a shooter placed his thumb on the hammer, when inserting the "cocked and locked" weapon into his holster.  I'll have to think more about that.  Somehow, it seems unnecessary.

Bill



  

Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: FireBreather01 on August 11, 2006, 05:42:52 PM
Quote
If you weren't holding the grip safety, would it stop the pistol from firing if the hammer did slip?
You have to depress the grip safety in order to get the hammer to drop. You then carefully let up on the trigger and lower the hammer to its half-cock notch, which ensures you're not resting the hammer on the FP. You depress the trigger just enough to release the hammer, then let up. Keeping the trigger depressed the enire time will drop it to the FP.

You can lower the hammer with your thumb and forefinger, keeping the thumb between the hammer and FP, or just use your thumb to lower the hammer. Either way, concentrate and do it very deliberately and slowly, and lower to the half-cock notch, keeping your finger off of the trigger after you've initially dropped the hammer.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: riffraff on August 12, 2006, 08:02:40 PM
I feel the need to state some facts here.  All the above precations/actions are not required with either a DAO, most of their triggers are very bad EXCEPT  for the R9, or a DA/SA with a decocker lever.  The 1911 even with modifications is hopelessly outdated/outclassed as a conceiled carry gun in this day and age.  I do not want to p*** anyone off.  These are just the facts.  For those who still think the 1911 is a decent carry gun please stop kidding yourself.   Just because you have grown up/grown old with the gun should not mean you can not see the advantages of better technology when it comes along.  All 1911's should be relegated to range use only.  They are not a gun you should be carrying or should have in your vehicle or in your night stand for use as a self defense gun.  These are my opinions  but I also believe they are reasonable facts.  I will stand by them.  Carry a 1911 if you want but understand you are doing so based on illogical/outmoded/old fashioned thinking.

Mike
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on August 12, 2006, 08:51:00 PM
But I and countless others, including the U. S. Marines and the FBI SWAT Team, would respectfully disagree.   8)

For example:  

http://www.sightm1911.com/
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: riffraff on August 12, 2006, 11:03:14 PM
They are not civilians.  Civilians do not have the training of those orginizations.  The mission and objectives of those orginizations are not even close to the Joe citizen with a conceiled carry permit.   For a citizen, even one quite familiar with firearms, a DA gun, ANY DA gun is not a reasonable conceiled carry option or one that should be in the vehicle or in or on the nightstand.

You haven't swayed me yet and you can't  because you don't have the revelant facts to back it up but you will probably still try.

Mike
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: BillinPittsburgh on August 12, 2006, 11:28:32 PM
Quote
They are not civilians.  Civilians do not have the training of those orginizations.  The mission and objectives of those orginizations are not even close to the Joe citizen with a conceiled carry permit.   For a citizen, even one quite familiar with firearms, a DA gun, ANY DA gun is not a reasonable conceiled carry option or one that should be in the vehicle or in or on the nightstand.

You haven't swayed me yet and you can't  because you don't have the revelant facts to back it up but you will probably still try.

Mike

You make incorrect ASSumptions about what training people do and don't have.

I used to think the same way you do about 1911's until I actually tried one.  I can draw this gun from a holster and put a faster, more accurate hit on target than with ANY other gun.

Wiping off the safety is the simplest part of the draw, and adds absolutely zero time to the draw.  My thumb often makes the same motion when drawing my Glocks.  Anyone who is worried about flubbing this part of the draw probably needs a lot more practice drawing whatever it is they carry, because other parts of the draw are much easier to flub.

The SA system is as safe as anything designed to discharge projectiles is ever going to be.  The thumb safety blocks the sear.  The grip safety blocks the trigger.  Even if the thumb safety is wiped off in the holster (Matt Del Fatti made me a holster which makes this impossible), both the grip safety and trigger must be depressed simultaneously for the gun to fire.  If the hammer were to slip off the full cock notch, the half-cock notch will catch it.  If the gun is dropped, the firing pin spring will hold the firing pin back.  If it really makes you nervous, then replace the firing pin with a titanium one and the firing pin spring with an extra power one (as I did), or get a 1911 with a firing pin block.  

Carrying a Glock (which I do often) or Springfield XD is much like carrying a Colt Series 80 1911 cocked and unlocked.  Find that surprising?  Compare the firing mechanisms of each, as well as the trigger pull resistance of each, and then tell me why I am wrong.

DA/SA systems require transitioning from one trigger pull to another between shots.  I have shot most of the guns presently available that use this system, and none of them has as nice a trigger as a 1911 in single action mode, or as nice a trigger as a DA revolver in DA mode.  Furthermore, about 40% of the women I have taken shooting had trouble with DA triggers with as little as 9 lb. of resistance.  This is why every gun I presently rely on for defense is a single trigger system with a light trigger pull, whether SA, DAO with a partially preset hammer or striker, or DAO with a trigger job.

Go to any IDPA match, and you will see that the 1911 is the 2nd most popular gun there (Glocks are first), and that there are more 1911's than everything else, excluding Glocks, combined.

I don't use 1911's because I "grew up" with anything.  I use them because putting many, many thousands of rounds downrange during practice, training, and competition have taught me that they work better than most other things available.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: riffraff on August 13, 2006, 12:07:32 AM
BillinPittsburg,

Well, if you want to take it a step lower we can do so,  you have made incorrect ASSumptions.

Many points of your posts are right on!   But the bottom line is this:  People who are only marginally familiar with firearms and have not had years of either "cock the hammer" or "release the safety" as soon as you draw will IN FACT either  forget to cock the hammer or forget to release the safety when they are in a split second life or death situation.
You might be an expert but the vast majority of people getting a CCP these days are not in your league.  You experts can carry any SA you want to but for the vast majority of people an SA is NOT A REASONABLE OPTION.
I have stated my opinions and really have no desire to continue but if you SA diehards want to continue, we can do so.

Mike
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: R9SCarry on August 13, 2006, 12:36:17 AM
Guys - I detect some rise in temperature here!!

Let's perhaps just agree to disagree - don't let it ramp up further.  Opinions are - just that - opinions. ;)
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: riffraff on August 13, 2006, 12:51:32 AM
R9SCarry,

I am not upset myself.  Just as you have stated, opinions are opinions but also sometimes facts are facts.  I believe that I have posted more relavent facts concerning SA, DAO, DA/SA/ Decocker for the average CCP holder than some of the correct (but not relavant) info. that has been posted about the SA as it pertains to the average CCP holder.

Mike
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: R9SCarry on August 13, 2006, 12:58:44 AM
Mike - I won't get in to this in any depth - but I happen to carry a SIG 226 as EDC primary - and tho well used to 1911 platform, including BHP - have chosen to go the DA/SA route - just suits me.

I do know plenty of folks with 1911's who go C&L and they are happy with it.  This mode with sufficient experience is potentially scary fast and accurate.

I do think tho that absolute newbs to handguns - in particular those who seek to carry one - need a very healthy amount of familiarization to be safe and good with them (1911's).

I am never too concerned about folk's carry choices - providing they are very familiar with the manual of arms of their chosen weapon, and can obey easily all the safety rules.  The choice finally is, as the saying goes - ''what works for the individual'' :)
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: riffraff on August 13, 2006, 01:54:50 AM
Chris,

I truly agree with everything you posted.  I am just trying to get across the fact that most of the CCP holders are not the "Gun Nuts" to the extent that we are.  And I mean gun nuts in a good way.  Most people are not willing or able to put in the time and repetetive exercises and range time required to be competent with a SA as their cary gun or even the gun they have in their nightstand.  Unless these people pretty much eat, breath, talk guns etc., etc.,  when they draw that single action  or they pull that single action out of the nightstand drawer they are probably going to forget that it either has the hammer down or it is cocked and locked and THEN if they  realy need to use it they will pull on the trigger and NOTHING will happen.

Mike
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: FireBreather01 on August 13, 2006, 02:32:23 AM
Quote
But the bottom line is this:  People who are only marginally familiar with firearms and have not had years of either "cock the hammer" or "release the safety" as soon as you draw will IN FACT either  forget to cock the hammer or forget to release the safety when they are in a split second life or death situation.
Sorry, this just shows your ignorance of the 1911, it should be carried in condition 1 - cocked and locked. Hammer down is a significant disadvantage in a self-defense scenario - I think this statement shows how 'scary looking' C&L is to you!
Quote
You might be an expert but the vast majority of people getting a CCP these days are not in your league.  You experts can carry any SA you want to but for the vast majority of people an SA is NOT A REASONABLE OPTION.
You've stated that "no one" should carry a 1911, and now you're acknowledging that those with experience will be fine.
Quote
I believe that I have posted more relavent facts concerning SA, DAO, DA/SA/ Decocker for the average CCP holder than some of the correct (but not relavant) info. that has been posted about the SA as it pertains to the average CCP holder.

Quote
The 1911 even with modifications is hopelessly outdated/outclassed as a conceiled carry gun in this day and age.
Mike, you haven't provided a single fact throughout this thread, you're stating opinions, which is fine, but they aren't facts. For your assertion that a newbie carrying a 1911 will forget the safety in a self-defense situation can only be proved by real-world events, I don't think we'll find too many. Your statement can never be proven, so it's not a fact.

What is a fact is that the 1911 has been used in more self-defense situations than any other semi-auto, the 1911 has likely won more pistol championships than any other, and the 1911 is actually a much easier gun to learn to shoot well than a DA, SA/DA, striker, etc. It has a short consistent trigger pull, excellent grip angle, and is a model of consistency.

The 1911 design is old, but it's also well-proven, and just because it scares you or you're not confident with it doesn't mean it sucks or shouldn't be used as a CCW piece. If one practices and trains they'll be fine with whatever platform they choose. If someone wants to carry with a minimum of training, then maybe a nice, safe, DA only pistol, or a revolver, is the way to go. Otherwise, it's entirely up to the individual. Your 'facts' aside, the 1911 is the most proven firearm on the planet - period ;D

If you're ever in WI - let's get to the range, I have about a dozen 1911's I'd love to show you, in 9mm, 10mm, 38 Super, and the venerable .45 - I guarantee we'll have fun :)
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: riffraff on August 13, 2006, 03:12:24 AM
FireBreather01,

You too have fallen to the untrue.  I am not afraid of cocked and locked or cocked and unlocked for that matter.  I am just not foolhardy enough t carry in either condition when there are many new, modern handguns that mean I don't have to bother with either of these conditions.  Yes, the 1911 has proven itself over the years BECAUSE for years there was no other large bore handgun to compete with it.  This is 2006.  Things have changed in the last 25 years.  This isn't the 1920's people.

You are one of those who just love to "quote" snippets from ppsts and then  of course take that one snippet apart.  I do not like posters like you.  You  have posted nothing to dispute the facts which I have typed in several posts prior to your one post.  I seriously doubt that you have carefully read the whole thread.

Well I will just come out and say it(again, but a little more plainly)and be done with it.  COMPARED TO MODERN HANDGUNS, THE 1911 IS A DINOSAUR THAT IS ONLY SUITABLE FOR RANGE AND COMPETETION USE.

Have I made myself clear?  Reread all my posts on this subject and don't try to pick  out a sentence and tear it apart.  Read all my posts and get the whole picture of what I haved been trying to say and base your replys on that.


Chris,  I really am not upset and have no desire to stir things up but I will not have the facts "CBS'ed" on this topic.

Of course I know this is hopeless as people will cycle thru every few days/weeks and they will all praise the 1911 as God's divine inspiration to John Moses Browning that John was probably commanded to give to the masses(kind of like Moses and the Ten Commandments).

In short, I will not view this thread any further.  Post what You will, I don't care. I have tried to inform as best I could but I understand that anyone on this forum is probably pretty much set in their ways as far as the 1911 is concerned.

Mike
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: theirishguard on August 13, 2006, 10:14:22 AM
OK guys,, cool off. There are those who like and can handle the 1911 type pistol and feel very comfortable carrying one. Usually they are experienced shooters and spend the time necesary to carry this fine pistol. For those folks who don't want to take the time or that feel that there are better choices, carry a wheel gun or a good DA pistol. What is important is that you can shoot what you carry well.
Tom
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: FireBreather01 on August 13, 2006, 01:14:25 PM
Tom, I'm certainly not upset and I haven't made any personally denigrating remarks - just a good old-fashioned campfire debate here, as far as I'm concerned.

The only fact that Mike keeps relying upon is that a DA doesn't need to have a safety and his one fact thus makes 1911's somehow obsolete. He keeps stating he has facts but in reality his facts are all just opinions - he thinks the 1911 is a relic compared to modern designs and because HE doesn't like it, therefore no one should - unless they're a "gun nut" and practice a lot. Well, I think we all agree about practicing.

Further, it is an OPINION or a THEORY that an inexperienced shooter will forget to wipe off a 1911 safety in a self-defense situation, not a fact. Hell, I've taught newbies that couldn't figure out how to get a revolver to work so stating that someone who's inexperienced is going to have problems is relatively self-fulfilling, isn't it?

And I'm sorry that Mike feels I've unfairly picked apart his statements. I don't think I was selective at all, his main arguments appear to be that the 1911 platform is outdated because there are other newer designs, that C&L is impossible for a newbie to manage, and that virtually every other pistol design is safer. Again, these are statements of opinion and are not facts. And at least on one occasion he flip-flopped, by first stating that no civilian is capable of carrying a 1911, then acknowledging that experience counts. I'll respond to any statement he wants to throw out here. I''m not going to change his mind, he won't change mine ::) but a lively discussion keeps things interesting, doesn't it? And we can keep it respectful while we disagree.

Finally, isn't this fun? 8)
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: BillinPittsburgh on August 13, 2006, 03:35:28 PM
If the issue is inexperienced shooters, then lets look at my own 1911 experience at a time when my training was minimal.

The first time I drew my then-new 1911 from a holster, I didn't wipe off the safety until I had the gun out and lined up with the target.  My total time was about twice what I usually accomplished.

The second time, I did wipe off the safety, but the draw took longer than I usually do.  This is the last time wiping off the safety has ever been a problem.

By my 4th draw, my time was equal to that I could achieve with the Glock I had drawn thousands of times previously.  From then on, I was always a couple tenths of a second faster with the 1911 then with anything else.

So there it is:  4 practice draws to learn to disengage the safety, without the benefit of an instructor present.

I have also read about a study performed by a police department wherein, starting with a .38 revolver and a cocked and locked 1911, they had shooters of all experience levels - from complete novices to competitors - pick up the gun and attempt to shoot the target 10 yards away.  The average time for the revolver was 2 seconds verses 17 seconds for the 1911.  A 15 second difference is huge if the gun in question is yours in the hands of an attacker who has just grabbed it, providing plenty of time to either retrieve it or draw a backup gun.

If, on the other hand, my wife is forced to use my gun to defend herself, I am more confident that she can quickly and efficiently work the safety of a 1911 than that she can struggle through a heavy DA trigger pull.

Of course, one could carry a DA/SA gun with the safety on safe, and gain the same advantage.  However, more likely than not, that safety is not designed to be disengaged with the natural downward movement the 1911 offers.

The design may be mechanically archaic in that it has twice as many parts as a Glock, but it has been proven under the worst conditions, and the human engineering of the 1911 is equal or superior to anything available today.  Shooting one is clear proof that more modern doesn't always equate better.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on August 13, 2006, 03:36:00 PM
And with all good humor, here is a photograph of this "old fossil's" two favorite "dinosaurs"   ;) :

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y30/RichardS/series80colts_1.jpg)

The Mustang was replaced as my backup by the NAA Guardian .380 in 2001, which in turn was replaced in the backup role by the R9 in 2004.  Even so, I occasionally take the Mustang out of the safe and carry it just for old times' sake.  It remains the most accurate small pistol I have ever owned -- Walther PPK included..
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: BillinPittsburgh on August 13, 2006, 08:22:42 PM
Hi Richard,

The Mustang and Gov't .380 are two guns I would love to see Colt bring back.  In addition to being a good backup gun as you demonstrated, I have long thought that their low recoil, ease of shooting, and thinness makes them ideal concealed carry guns for the ladies.  The one lady I know who owns one agrees.  Of course these same characteristics make it ideal for us as well.

Title: Bill:Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on August 14, 2006, 10:20:59 AM
Bill:

I also regret the discontinuance of the Colt Mustang and Government .380.  I suppose Colt's decision was based in part on the financial turmoil it experienced as a result of the Beretta 9mm's coming into vogue during the "NATO standardization era."  (Apparently, the "gurus" who decreed that change somehow failed to foresee the effects which desert sand can have on a Beretta.)

As you know, the Mustang is simply a smaller, lighter, and somewhat simplified version of the Government Model .380, having the same 1911-style firing mechanism.  The Mustang design eliminated the barrel bushing and spring plug.  Mine came with a flexible synthetic full-length recoil spring guide rod and a plastic trigger.  Since I am one of those traditionalist types who do not like to have any plastic parts in my handguns, I replaced them with a stainless steel guide rod and an aircraft aluminum trigger from Scott, McDougall and Associates (SM&A).  (Sadly, SM&A closed shop in 2002 due to the serious illness of Doug McDougall, who tragically died at the untimely age of 40 in 2004.)

Like its big brother in the photograph above, the Mustang pictured is a stainless steel model and sports Sambar Stag grips from Ajax Custom Grips. Since it does not have a grip safety, I choose not to carry it C&L. However, I long ago developed the instinctive practice of disengaging the Mustang's safety and racking its slide during the process of drawing the weapon.  The entire process can be accomplished in the time it takes to place the weapon on target.  

The only "quirk" which I experienced with the Mustang during my familiarization period was that the safety lever could be pushed up into the safe position by the right thumb during the recoil phase.  The easy solution to that is simply to develop the practice of placing the thumb on top of of the lever when firing.

As mentioned, I choose not to carry the Mustang C&L due to its lack of a grip safety.  As a result, unlike the situation with a C&L 1911 (with which you need only to disengage the safety during the draw), my process of racking the slide while presenting the Mustang requires two hands.  For that reason, I switched to the DAO design for backup when such pistols of comparable quality, smaller size, and equal or larger caliber became available -- i.e., the Guardian .380 in 2001 and the R9 in 2004.  However, the Mustang's big brother, the 1911 pictured above, remains my primary weapon.  I expect it to remain so until I finally fold my cards, cash in my chips, and take my leave of this grand casino known as life.   8)  

Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: dfsutton on August 14, 2006, 12:26:22 PM
Well, I must say that I fall into the category of those that love both the Glock and the 1911. My first love was a Kimber Ultra CDP II. I purchased it to be my primary carry piece and bought a Versa Max II to carry it in

(http://static.flickr.com/68/215095587_04d4482535.jpg)

However, more recently my brother-in-law started trying to convince me of the merits of carrying a Glock. He told me of how they are 100% reliable whether they're dirty, wet, dunked in salt water, or just chipped out of a block of ice. He told me about the lifespan of the gun which should be well over 100,000 rounds. He told me about a ton of other things.

Well, I never wanted a Glock and I never liked the people that swore by Glock. It seemed to me that a large portion of inexperienced shooters swear by them just because of the name association. I was convinced that i disliked Glocks even though I had never touched one.

So, I did what any self respecting man does. I put my money where my mouth is and I went to my local gun range and I shot over 200 rounds with they're rental Glock 30 (45 ACP). I loved it. This gun had been on the rental rack for several years and they had never cleaned it. Not a problem. No malfunctions of any kind. Kept popping the paper where I was putting it. It was great and I knew I was gonna have to get one, so yesterday I just won an auction at Gunbroker for a Glock 30 with Night sights. I already know it's gonna be my new carry piece. I mean no disrespect to the Kimber, but the Glock is not much larger, has an additional 3 rounds of .45 ACP per magazine and has the benefit of the 6 lb DAO trigger. The reason I say benefit is because of the legal liability of a 3.5 lb SA trigger. Any of you who read Massad Ayoob should know what I'm talking about.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: theirishguard on August 14, 2006, 12:43:17 PM
I still would carry the Kimber and not the Glock. How many AD's do the Glocks have compared to the total number of Glocks out there.
Tom
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: FireBreather01 on August 14, 2006, 01:17:08 PM
Quote
I still would carry the Kimber and not the Glock. How many AD's do the Glocks have compared to the total number of Glocks out there.
That's an interesting statement and highlights the dissonance that C&L creates. It LOOKS, to the uninitiated, as if it's very unsafe - like if you touch it it will somehow magically fire. But the 1911 is simply one of the safest designs available and an AD with a 1911 is really a very difficult task to accomplish.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: dfsutton on August 14, 2006, 01:40:46 PM
Quote
How many AD's do the Glocks have compared to the total number of Glocks out there.
Tom

The answer would be zero if we were all intelligent, properly trained gun owners and followed all the proper safety rules. I personally do not believe there is a such thing as an accidental discharges. They are all negligent in my book. Anytime a weapon goes off when it is not supposed to, that reflects none upon the gun and everything upon the idiot carrying it.

Safeties are mechanical and all mechanical devices fail. The only true safety is the person carrying the gun.

But that's not even the real issue here. The issue in my book is the civil liability when a shooting occurs. Any trigger that is 4lbs or lighter (and especially those that are 4lb SA) could be labeled as a "Hair Trigger" by the prosecution. By having a "hair trigger" on your carry gun you open yourself up to them being able to portray what is truely a self defense shooting, which would be justifiable homicide and a not guilty verdict, as a "horrible, yet unintentional accident" that would not be murder, but very likely manslaughter.

Massad Ayoob gives tons of examples of this in his writings. I think its a very valid point and something that any 1911 owner should look at. That 3.5lb trigger pull is excellent for 1" groups, but what might it cost you in the court room?
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: theirishguard on August 14, 2006, 03:19:23 PM
OK,Dave, I agree, however many police officers have had AD's with Glocks. As I remember even an instructor talking with a class of officers had an AD in front of them while carrying a Glock. There was a film strip on this and may have been shown on this forum. Maybe someone can find this.
Tom
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: FireBreather01 on August 14, 2006, 05:28:03 PM
I believe the gun in question here was a Glock -
http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=local&id=3959456

And then there's this -
http://www.virusbrown.com/temp/cop%20gives%20a%20talk%20on%20guns.wmv

I agree with you, df, no excuses. I think what Tom is saying, in relation this specific thread where the safety of 1911's is in question, the Glock has a reputation for relatively frequent AD's, while the 1911 has a very good reputation. It doesn't excuse the shooter from paying attention to the four rules, no matter what the configuration!
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: dfsutton on August 14, 2006, 07:16:38 PM
Quote
I think what Tom is saying, in relation this specific thread where the safety of 1911's is in question, the Glock has a reputation for relatively frequent AD's, while the 1911 has a very good reputation. It doesn't excuse the shooter from paying attention to the four rules, no matter what the configuration!

I think the reputation for negligent discharge may have more to do with the general population make-up of the ownership groups than the guns.

Like I said earlier, the stereotype of Glock owners is that of some random guy who decides he needs a gun and rushes out and buys a Glock just because he's heard of their name. He can't shoot, knows nothing about safety, but wears Glock Logo gear all day. He is the kind of guy that shoots his own foot off.

The stereotypical 1911 owner is a gray-haired gentleman who most likely was in the military in his youth. He grew up shooting and owned many guns before getting a 1911 (partially due to cost).

Like all stereotypes, I feel these are based somewhat in truth. 1911 owners are for the most part older, more experienced, and know the fundamentals of safety. Glock owners tend to be younger and not as well versed in gun and safety kowledge. Does that make the Glock lesser than the 1911 because of the class of people that tend to use it? I think not.

Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on August 14, 2006, 08:39:59 PM
Quote
The stereotypical 1911 owner is a gray-haired gentleman who most likely was in the military in his youth. He grew up shooting and owned many guns before getting a 1911 (partially due to cost).

You called?  (Add an acronym or two and I'm your man.)   8)
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: PursuitSS on August 14, 2006, 10:01:39 PM
AD's are almost ALWAYS due to a lack of training. They occur with MANY pistols, Glock's, 1911's, HK P7's, etc., etc.
 
I feel comfortable will all of them, BUT, you are much better off sticking with ONE pistol if your life depends on it.

I carry a Glock 17L 9mm loaded with Winchester 127 gr. +P+ rounds on duty, I can carry ANYTHING OR CALIBER I want. (R.H.I.P.) I chose the 17L because of:

You must pick your weapon based on trust, if you don't trust a 1911, it's not a good choice for YOU!

PursuitSS
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: BillinPittsburgh on August 14, 2006, 11:55:33 PM
This 1911 owner is 35 tears old but has just started to get a few gray hairs.

I like both 1911's and Glocks for many of the same reasons.

The statement that 1911 owners tend to be more sophisticated has some truth to it, but only to a very limited extent.  The vast majority of people who I see who really know what they are doing seem to choose Glocks most often, with 1911's being a close second.  The HK P7 and various Sig pistols will be thrown into the mix in lesser quantities, with others in the mix as well.

This may come as a surprise to some, but the single most intelligent group of shooters I have encountered are those who are into high end pocket pistols - Rohrbaugh, Seecamp, and North American Arms.  As proof, read the quality of the posts on forums dedicated to such guns, as compared to posts on forums dedicated to other guns.

My guess as to why is that they tend to be people who are very serious about either carrying a BUG or about being very discreetly armed 16/7.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: tracker on August 16, 2006, 07:04:58 PM
To add further fuel and confusion to this discussion, Sig is
coming out with a P220R--single action only, with a thumb
safety because " there is now a strong trend among elite
units in law enforcement to choose and use cocked and locked
.45s and the same desire exists within certain units of the U.S.
military". The more things change---------.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: dfsutton on August 16, 2006, 11:33:54 PM
Joy!

More to argue about.  ::)
Title: IRe: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: tracker on August 16, 2006, 11:59:05 PM
I was only trying to illustrate the futility of the argument.
Personal preferences and individual skill levels cannot be
relegated to a single standard in this case.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: R9SCarry on August 17, 2006, 01:50:57 AM
I am reminded yet again of the old adage -

" Beware the man with but one gun'' :)  It is one reason why for 20 months now my primary has been the 226 - and i use the 228 for practice - they are so close it matters not and the manual of arms is identical.

I have come to think more and more over the years - too much swapping of carry pieces is not conducive to optimal results - the exception in my case being the R9 - as BUG or occasional primary - but then I am familiar with the pup now.:)
Title: Re: IRe: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on August 17, 2006, 10:09:28 AM
Quote
Personal preferences and individual skill levels cannot be relegated to a single standard in this case.

Truer words are rarely written.   8)
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Michigunner on August 17, 2006, 10:50:55 AM
That is a statement full of wisdom.  It will be useful when dealing  with dogmatic people.

Thank you, tracker.

Bill
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Aglifter on August 19, 2006, 12:35:56 PM
You can't go with just one CCW, then the others get jealous... ;D

You're right, though, I'm sure -- I really should carry my IDPA gun (XD 45 5") -- I keep it in my briefcase, I've just haven't found a very comfortable way to carry other than in my pocket -- well, that, and they get sweaty IWB -- untucked isn't an option, really, can't have a sloppy appearance and make food.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on August 19, 2006, 09:00:55 PM
The October 2006 edition of Guns & Weapons for Law Enforcement contains a favorable review by Matt Berger of the SIGARMS "Revolution" 1911 .45 ACP.  Berger notes that SIG's new 1911 has just been selected by the Boston Police Department's Entry & Apprehension Team.  His review concludes with this comment:

"The gun delivers accuracy with reliability, and has all of the qualities of the classic 1911 design that have withstood the test of almost 100 years, and remains one of the most popular designs in the new century.  Beyond utility, this is a darn good-looking pistol.  The Revolution Stainless Rail is a triumph for SIGARMS, and should be a welcomed choice for any 1911 shooter."

Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: twostar on October 10, 2006, 03:46:30 PM
So what is Riffraff?  An anti Luddite?  One thing he definitely is, is in the minority.  I don't know what type of 1911 you couldn't hit with but, you bring your Browning (which is a very nice gun, surprisingly designed by the same guy who designed the 1911) and I'll bring my 1911, and we'll have a little contest, perhaps for a dollar or two?  Then, if you like, we can switch guns and do it all over again?  Either you had a real dog of a .45 or the 1911 is too much gun for you personally.

I've carried a 1911 of one form or another for over 40 years, always Condition One, cocked and locked, and never had an AD.  I've also hit dangerous targets with lesser calibers than the .45 and failed to drop them with solid hits.  Does the term 9 mm mean anything to you?  It's never happened to me with a .45.  

My point is not so much to specifically defend the 1911, but to defend the position that anyone should tell someone else what defensive weapon to carry.  The best firearm in the world is useless if you are not comfortable with it, and a well placed minor caliber can be very effective if properly placed.  

As for the 1911 being obsolete, and being repalced by double/single action guns, most of the REAL experts I know consider the D/S Action to be an answer to a problem that doesn't exist, unless you consider the reaction of the uninformed to a cocked hammer.

The choice of a defensive weapon is about as personal as one can get.  You choose what you like and keep your nose out of my choice.  Otherwise you're creeping into the territory of the anti gunners.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: riffraff on October 10, 2006, 09:00:23 PM
twostar,

Carry whatever you want.

I haven't owned a Hi-Power for many years.

I have never owned a 1911.

I will never own another single action again.  There are just to many better handguns out there.

Mike
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: tracker on October 10, 2006, 09:04:27 PM
"Better" is in the eye of the beholder. Isn't it a wonder that
they are still making 1911s in the face of all those better
guns?
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on October 11, 2006, 09:35:58 AM
Quote
"Better" is in the eye of the beholder. Isn't it a wonder that
they are still making 1911s in the face of all those better
guns?

And now, Taurus has a new offering for the 1911 market.  This is from a review by Dick Metcalf entitled "Taurus's PT 1911: A true Testament To The Grand Old 1911" appearing in
Shooting Times/i]:

[size=10]The newest auto pistol from Taurus (Dept. ST, 16175 NW. 49th Ave., Miami, FL 33255; 800-327-3776; www.taurususa.com) is a very old familiar friend: a Government Model 1911.

The official name is Taurus Model PT 1911, and this .45 ACP pistol was introduced at the 2005 S.H.O.T. Show in January. It now becomes the firearms industry's latest testimonial to the world's seemingly insatiable demand for this most classic of all classic pistol designs. I got my hands on a preproduction model and can testify that it is a real tribute to the Model 1911. [/size]

http://www.shootingtimes.com/handgun_reviews/pt_080505/#cont
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: twostar on October 12, 2006, 09:25:14 AM
I think you got that quote wrong, Tracker.  Isn't it "Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder?"
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: tracker on October 12, 2006, 12:55:10 PM
You are correct, sir, and the more beers the more beauty.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on October 12, 2006, 03:31:44 PM
Quote
You are correct, sir, and the more beers the more beauty.

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y30/RichardS/benjamin_franklin.jpg)
Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)

 ;)
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Paveway on October 14, 2006, 12:57:59 AM
You'll get no complaints from me about Ol' Slabsides. Tried and true design. I've carried, done chores and took naps with one cocked and locked in a proper holster. Call me an old fart if you want to, but if I need a big gun, this is the one for me.

If you're stupid (apologies to who this applies to) dont buy a 1911. As with all guns, KEEP YOUR FINGER OUT OF THE TRIGGER GUARD!!!!! And don't try to lower the hammer on a live round. Remove the magazine and rack the slide to eject the live round in the pipe. Repeat  racking slide (I do it 3 times for any semi auto) and visually check the breach to be sure it's empty.

Safety? If you have a Colt series 80 or Kimber series II, did you know that there are 4 SAFETIES?

1. External Thumb Safety
2. Grip Safety
3. Firing pin Safety
4. Your index finger. Keep it off of the trigger.

How many safeties does a Glock have? Kahr? Our beloved R9? Not as many as the 1911. It amazes me how people seem to think that these modern weapons are somehow safer.

PLUS, how many of you can completely take apart a modern handgun down to the bare frame and put it back together? You can with a 1911. You're not even supposed to take a Glock apart or all those parts will go boing across the room. Says so in the Glock manual. You're supposed to take it to a Glock armorer or some such nonsense.

If you are gadget shy and dont like mechanical things, don't buy a 1911. It's the most simple yet sophisticated design for a handgun ever designed.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Richard S on October 14, 2006, 07:43:09 AM
Paveway:

Well said!  Colonel Cooper would have approved.   8)
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Michigunner on October 14, 2006, 08:35:53 AM
Paveway,

I was happy to come back to the 1911, after buying a Kimber Custom Stainless Target II.

I enjoy how slim it is, and how it fits small hands just perfectly.

It is truly a remarkable handgun.

Bill  

Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: riffraff on October 14, 2006, 08:16:22 PM
Paveway,

It's great that you like antiques, more power to you.  Lots of people like antiques, that is why variations of the 1911 continue to be sold and why the Browning Hi-Power is still in production.  Modern handguns don't need all the "safeties" you mentioned.  That is because they are modern.

I have owned two Lugers in the past.  A real one and a stainless steel one.  Nice guns.  The stainless steel one was the most beautiful handgun I have ever owned(except for my standard R9) but after the gee wiz wore off I sold them.  They, like the 1911 have been totally outclassed by modern handguns.  Although I will admit that steady tweaking of the 1911 has gone on thru the years to make it as good as a single action can be made.

Mike
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Paveway on October 15, 2006, 12:07:47 PM
Riffraff, that's what's so cool about this hobby. There's something for everyone to like. 8)

One persons dislike of one type of handgun is another's pure joy. And that's OK too.

The main thing is that we have and keep the right to OWN guns and SPEAK openly about it here in America.
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: riffraff on October 15, 2006, 12:11:24 PM
Well said Paveway.  I certainly agree.

Mike
Title: Re: Lower hammer on live round - M1911
Post by: Michigunner on October 15, 2006, 04:07:27 PM
Amen to that.