« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Combat Handguns Article  (Read 3186 times)

Offline 9mil.mouse

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Combat Handguns Article
« on: November 27, 2004, 05:07:58 PM »
Hey Gang, I don't believe I've heard any reactions here to the very postivie article on Rohrbaughs that is in the current issue of Combat Handguns. It even has a pic of the Rohrbaugh on its cover, along with another pistol. The issue has been out for a few days now. Anybody else notice it?    ;D
Logged

Offline TW

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 537
Combat Handguns Article
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2004, 06:00:22 PM »
>>Yep...  I picked up a copy last week enjoyed the read.  Can't say that I learned anything NEW from it...but it was informative and as I recall it profiled the R9 as a true self defense pocket gun - perhaps more so than some of the earlier reports.  Possibly this article will reach a section of the shooting community which other reports did not (??)...?...TW<<  
Logged

Offline Brenden

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1747
  • Farmie!!!
Re: Combat Handguns Article
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2004, 08:06:16 PM »
Logged
NRA Life Patron Member
GOA
Molon Labe

Offline R9SCarry

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2657
  • Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
Re: Combat Handguns Article
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2004, 10:12:09 PM »
Yet to find a copy! >:(
Logged
Chris - R9S
Guns don't kill people - people kill people.
R9 FAQ Site
NRA Life member and Certified Instructor.

Offline DDGator

  • Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2631
    • The Rohrbaugh Forum
Re: Combat Handguns Article
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2004, 12:14:22 AM »
Well, aside from a gramatical error (repeated twice), a typo (repeated twice), a fact error (repeated twice), and an inconsistency... I thought it was pretty good.

Interestingly, much of the conclusions and opinions sounded like something I vaguely recall reading, or perhaps writing, before...   ;D   Maybe Mr. Pridgen shares the same biases!  :P

Logged
Duane (DDGator)
Rohrbaugh Forum Administrator
E-mail: Admin-at-RohrbaughForum.com

Offline 9mil.mouse

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: Combat Handguns Article
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2004, 04:35:35 PM »
LOL! I caught the typo on p. 30 where they printed R9S but should have said the "R-nines" but missed the others! We could just say the article is O.K. except for the mistakes, but that leaves a whole lot of wiggle room. Anyway, when I read the article I thought "this guy is on the right track."   ;D
Logged

Offline DDGator

  • Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2631
    • The Rohrbaugh Forum
Re: Combat Handguns Article
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2004, 10:17:48 AM »
Yes, it was a good review -- I just think his editors let him down a bit.

Logged
Duane (DDGator)
Rohrbaugh Forum Administrator
E-mail: Admin-at-RohrbaughForum.com

Offline chameleon

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
Re: Combat Handguns Article
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2004, 07:26:17 AM »
I'd like to comment on this if I may, and I may be way off .

It has been my experiance with articles of any type that there are inconsitencies with the facts. The more facts about a certain article that you have, the more you see how the article is just not spot on.
For instance this article about the R9s', people here on the forum have more facts than the gunscripe.
I see this in local newspapers especially.If I am involved in a certain event, then read about it in the paper, it never seems factual.
Of corse most times the reporter writes what he is told.
Hey, I just wanted to throw this opinion of mine out there.
I always tell my students to read these articles with a grain of salt.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »