Rocnerd,
Do you carry the 229 because of the higher capacity? Why not carry the 239?
I might think it is comforting to know that you have 5 additional bullets.
Rocnerd,The trigger pull is a lot longer than the glock, but nicer. You can do a short reset, that results in a harder pull if you want or let it out all the way for a nice easy pull. As far as accuracy they both shoot just fine. I have shot controlled pairs with the holes touching and two inches apart with both guns. I don't know if one is inherently more accurate than the other. For me they shoot about the same. Recoil is softer on the 229 due to the heft of the gun. It feels much heavier, don't know the actual weights, than the glock. The 229 is also a bit bigger than the Glock 23. I carried the glock in an IWB kydex from sidearmor mostly and the Sig in a pancake style leather OWB. Hard to compare the two carry methods. I am 6' and slim and can conceal with the 229 with just a dark colored T-shirt with minimal printing. With a comparable holster for the glock I would feel about the same.
The reason I am considering this gun is because I have because I like the idea of each and every pull of the trigger "feels" the same.
Does the trigger pull and grouping somewhat the same to the Glock?
Also, when carrying in holster, does it "print" the same under concealment carry?
Thanks!
I am a Glock person and have been considering the SAS due to it being "rounded" for concealed carry. No experience with Sig Arms.
Any input appreciated.
When you were wearing your "thong" in public and carry the 239, did you wear it (your gun) in the front or the back?I understand he tried to stuff a sock in his thong but didn`t get any action.He then discovered it was supposed to go in the FRONT not the BACK.