The Rohrbaugh Forum

Miscellaneous => Other Guns => Topic started by: glazier on May 07, 2005, 12:03:49 AM

Title: Kel-Tec
Post by: glazier on May 07, 2005, 12:03:49 AM
Well, now that I've become curious about Kahr, I might as well vent my spleen about the Kel-Tec's I own.  Both of mine (P32's) have been a great disappointment to me! Flat & Functional was what I wanted.  Flacid and Failures was what I got.  I figured the first one was just a fluke... the second one I bought, well, shame on me!  They come in a neat package but they're all dressed up with no where to go!   :D
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: BillinPittsburgh on May 07, 2005, 12:49:27 AM
Kel-Tec's general reputation is for spotty QC but good customer service.  Have you spoken with the factory and/or sent the guns back for them to look at?

If you do keep them, I strongly recommend replacing the 9 lb. recoil springs with 11 lb. Wolff springs.  When your gun is loaded with 7+1, the 9 lb. springs don't have enough strength to dislodge the rim of the top cartridge in the clip from the groove in the cartridge below it.
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: flyandscuba on May 29, 2005, 11:37:16 PM
All of my KTs have been basically flawless from the box -- P-32, P-3AT, P-3AT/.32NAA, P-11, P-40, P-357, Sub2K, & SU-16.  All I've done is polish some feedramps and added some accessories.

Sorry you seem to have a couple with problems.  Go visit www.ktrange.com -- there is much information on doing an "F&B" to make these little pocket pistols run smoothly.

I usually carry the P-3AT/.32NAA daily as a pocket gun in an RJ Hedley holster -- I do trust it with my life.  Also, the gunsmiths at KT are extremely responsive to customer problems/issues.  I've been over to the factory several times and have been impressed with all whom I've met over there.
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: TexasCajun on May 30, 2005, 09:57:51 PM
Ditto to what F&S said.  I have all calibers and they are all quite reliable.  I have not yet shot my 32naa conversion as it's a fairly new aquisition and I had to order some ammo.  Kel-tecs are easy to tweak and the customer service is superb.  
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: RJ HEDLEY on May 31, 2005, 08:27:54 AM
I usually carry the P-3AT/.32NAA daily as a pocket gun in an RJ Hedley holster -- I do trust it with my life.   // Fly

...........................................................

My  choice, exactly .    ;D
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: R9SCarry on May 31, 2005, 10:33:10 PM
RJ - curiosity - I am assuming you have done the conversion yes?  Are you liking it?
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: RJ HEDLEY on June 02, 2005, 09:05:31 PM
I love it,   I think it is a great caliber..    I had 4 of these conversions,  sold two of them.  

I carry one daily and have stash of Cor-Bon..

edited to add..   One is in Hard chrome, other is Parkerized
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: Richard S on June 02, 2005, 10:56:06 PM
I hear the beautiful music, but it doesn't yet seem to be in my key.  While I have occasionally been able to anticipate and catch the "curl of the wave"  (e.g., NAA Guardian .380 and Rohrbaugh 9mm), I have pretty much been a traditionalist for most of my life.  By way of example, for at least 30 years, I considered the Walther PPK to be the ultimate pocket pistol. The Walther PPK is, and always will be a classic, but I no longer consider it to be the ultimate pocket pistol.

Things have changed, and I am still trying to learn.

Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: RJ HEDLEY on June 03, 2005, 04:23:13 PM
Richard
Are you familiar with the KT /32 NAA conversion?   I can't "heard" you from here, so I will clarify.  KT unofficially made about 30 special barrels to chamber 32 NAA.  They were sold to the KT employees that wanted them.,  for evaluation.  :)  In the months past, the Barrels have found their way into hands of outsiders..
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: Richard S on June 06, 2005, 07:48:26 AM
RJ:

I had heard something about the Kel-Tec project.  Do you have photographs of the two?

RS
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: RJ HEDLEY on June 06, 2005, 08:13:24 AM
It looks as the others, only I had "32 NAA' engraved on the bbl. for positive, fast Identity.     I also had to have some nice leather for the "Little Champ'

(http://www.fototime.com/4A6317A5FF09D76/standard.jpg)
(http://www.fototime.com/60F28BDF4687474/standard.jpg)
(http://www.fototime.com/495E90CE183AE2F/standard.jpg)
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: Richard S on June 06, 2005, 08:33:06 AM
Beautiful, RJ!  The engraving is a nice touch, indeed.  And the photograph of the holster reminds me that it is time for me to return the prototype of the newly designed Limited Edition for monograming or a monogrammed replacement.  It is truly one superb holster design!  I'll try to get to the Post Office later today.

RS
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: RJ HEDLEY on June 06, 2005, 10:52:15 AM
Richard

Don't you dare send that back to me,  I still haven't got your holster on the bench yet, but this does serve as a reminder to me..,  **Richard is my friend,   make his holster !!.  **

Yes, I see the Avator  ;D
Title: Re: Kel-Tec
Post by: flyandscuba on June 07, 2005, 08:43:18 PM
It's pretty accurate too...  Not bad for 25 yards.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v250/flyandscuba/MVC-019S.jpg)