Author Topic: 115gr Vs. 124gr  (Read 1929 times)

Offline hoserack

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • #R2660
115gr Vs. 124gr
« on: May 05, 2008, 06:54:27 PM »
OK, what is the best round to throw at mr. bad guy?
Fast or heavy?
I'm no balistics expert so feedback would be appreciated.

Offline RickP

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Re: 115gr Vs. 124gr
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2008, 04:11:03 PM »
Hose,

I read somewhere on the internet that the 115 was the way to go in a 3 inch barrel. Don't remember where I read it, and have no way to know if it's good info or not, but that is what I carry. I'm supprised none of the balistics gurus have weighed in on this yet.

Rick


Offline Richard S

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 5772
  • Nemo me impune lacessit.
Re: 115gr Vs. 124gr
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2008, 06:12:00 PM »
Here are some links to threads which may be of interest:

http://www.rohrbaughforum.com/YaBB.cgi?board=R9S;action=display;num=1155009072;start=0#0

http://www.rohrbaughforum.com/YaBB.cgi?board=Other;action=display;num=1167497311;start=3#3

Based on his wet-pack testing, "Flyandscuba" reports that he prefers 115-grain Speer Gold Dots for his R9.

I understand that Karl Rohrbaugh prefers Winchesterf Silver Tips.

I personally have come around to the "big-and-slow" school of thought and load 147-grain Remington Golden Saber BJHPs in my R9.

Reasonable minds differ on this subject.  8)

« Last Edit: May 06, 2008, 06:16:35 PM by Richard_S »
(1963-1967) "GO ARMY!"

Offline RickP

  • Expert
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Re: 115gr Vs. 124gr
« Reply #3 on: May 07, 2008, 03:55:40 PM »
From Richard's first link above it would seem the 115 GDHPs are the way to go.

Rick

Offline hoserack

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • #R2660
Re: 115gr Vs. 124gr
« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2008, 12:26:35 AM »
Quote
From Richard's first link above it would seem the 115 GDHPs are the way to go.

Rick
Yep, that's what I bought.