The Rohrbaugh Forum

Miscellaneous => Other Guns => Topic started by: tracker on June 17, 2006, 11:14:31 PM

Title: HK45
Post by: tracker on June 17, 2006, 11:14:31 PM
http://www.guns-weapons.com/

Attached link on the two new HK45 models about to
hatch; Bill, are you out there?
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: CaptBW on June 18, 2006, 08:15:25 AM
Just when I thought I didn't need another gun.
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: glioma on June 18, 2006, 11:20:03 AM
Is this the gun? This must be the full model.

http://www.vickerstactical.com/articles/ShotgunNews.pdf
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Michigunner on June 18, 2006, 11:58:05 AM
tracker, I've been watching it with great interest!  Purchase was going to be automatic.

Meanwhile, I was forced to make a decision.  My HK USP .45 is on the borderline of being too large, because of small hands.

At the same time, they were starting to build a Milt Sparks 55BN belt holster for the USP above.

I called Milt Sparks just in time and switched the holster to the Compact model, and then ordered the Compact from CDNN in Abilene, Texas.

It arrived overnight and I'll pick it up tomorrow.  Teddy Jacobson's favorite small .45s are the Glock 36 and the USP Compact.

The HK45 looks much the same, except you can change the grip  backstraps for a better fit.  I hope it becomes the new US military pistol.

Bill
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: tracker on June 18, 2006, 01:49:48 PM
I noticed that the new HK 45 has the O ring barrel whereas
I think that the only USP model to have that feature is
the Tactical model in addition to the MK 23. Am I reading
that correctly?
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Michigunner on June 18, 2006, 02:11:41 PM
I don't know much about the O ring.  Will have to look into that.
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: flyandscuba on June 18, 2006, 09:14:44 PM
Yes, the O-ring is a feature in the Mark 23, USP Tactical, and USP Compact Tactical (also available in .45 -- and for sale now, if you can't wait for the HK45).

I'll be buying the HK45 as soon as I can find one available.
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: harrydog on June 19, 2006, 09:24:17 AM
The O-ring supposedly improves accuracy by keeping the barrel stationary for a fraction of a second longer.
I had a USP45 Tactical and a USP9 but sold them. I didn't like their ergonomics. The new USP45 has apparently addressed that issue, so I'll be taking a close look when they become available.
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Michigunner on July 11, 2006, 09:58:06 AM
When the HK45 arrives, this could be a good place to buy.  Both of my USP 45s came from there.

http://cdnn.powerfulhosting.com/objects/4686.itml/icOid/4686?icObjectId=4686&icQuery=&icJumpPage=2
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: tracker on July 11, 2006, 12:48:02 PM
Thanks for the link, Bill; I had seen their catalog before
but had forgotten about them and enjoyed the revisit.
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Michigunner on July 11, 2006, 07:23:30 PM
You are welcome, tracker.

The great part is their low price!
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: theirishguard on July 12, 2006, 10:11:23 AM
HK has a new plant and office in Columbus, Ga. Just outside Ft. Benning.....so they are really after the new US pistol contract as well as the new rifle contract.
Tom
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Michigunner on July 15, 2006, 11:33:34 PM
The new HK45 is starting to look a little goofy.  I realize this is not the final version, most likely.

Well, maybe it's  just a color problem.

Bill

http://sigforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/430601935/m/744100526/r/621102526#621102526
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: TXAGGIECHL on July 16, 2006, 01:45:35 AM
I personally don't like it either.  It's a coin-toss between the Beretta 90-Two and the HK45 for who has the UGLIEST gun of 2006.  

Both look hideous!
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Richard S on July 16, 2006, 09:23:59 AM
Bill & TXAGGIE:

I't good to know that I'm not the only one out here who has the same thoughts in that issue.  
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Michigunner on July 16, 2006, 10:40:41 AM
Richard,

My new HK USP .45 Compact can be carried Cocked and Locked, but that's way over my head.

I may try it sometime, maybe for a week, and see if I shoot my leg.  I was thinking about walking up and down the beach where there is lots of sand.

Did you ever carry that way?

Bill
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: theirishguard on July 16, 2006, 11:56:06 AM
Bill, The only way to carry a Colt type 1911 is cocked and locked. In the early days of ISPC all the ranges were hot. Everyone carried that way. But no one was allowed to touch the gun out of the holster. Its a mind thing and it takes getting use to. After awhile, it becomes second nature. The safety needs to be set strong so it can't be brushed off. Remember theirs a grip safety also.
Tom
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Michigunner on July 16, 2006, 12:20:51 PM
Hi Tom,

I was just thinking about the grip safety, too.

The problem is that the HK USP does not have one.

But, I know what you mean.  As long as the controls and trigger are safe with the holster, everything should be fine.

It's getting into the right frame of mind that is slowing some of us down.  I really prefer the single-action mode.  There's less chance for the pistol to wiggle around while you are pulling the trigger.

I even keep trying to pull the hammer back on my S&W 642 J-frame, but it's not there.

Bill  
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Richard S on July 18, 2006, 06:50:04 PM
Bill:  

Here is a link to my current mode of carrying my 1911:

http://www.rohrbaughforum.com/YaBB.cgi?board=Other;action=display;num=1145297620

In any event, I consider a grip safety to be an essential component of "cocked and locked" carry for a single-action 1911-type pistol.
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: BlueGrips on July 18, 2006, 07:55:34 PM
Quote

My new HK USP .45 Compact can be carried Cocked and Locked, but that's way over my head.

I may try it sometime, maybe for a week, and see if I shoot my leg...


Biil: If this pretry lady can do it, you can, too!  ;D

(http://rcfalcon.com/stuff/USPc45/ggsavanna245fz.jpg)
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Richard S on July 20, 2006, 09:07:07 AM
Blue Grips:

That post of yours cost me $45.00 plus tax -- the price of a dozen roses.  (I got caught looking at it a little too long.)   :-/
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: theirishguard on July 20, 2006, 05:52:01 PM
Richard, it was time you got roses for your bride anyway.  ;D
Tom
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: tracker on July 20, 2006, 09:17:36 PM
What Richard doesn't know is that $50. or so is cheap
for a dozen roses; what he does know is that it is cheaper
than a divorce.
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: BlueGrips on July 21, 2006, 11:12:05 PM
Quote
Blue Grips: That post of yours cost me $45.00 plus tax -- the price of a dozen roses.  (I got caught looking at it a little too long.)   :-/

"Oh, there you are, Honey! I was just staring at that pretty looking H&K USPc!"
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Richard S on July 22, 2006, 10:54:59 PM
Quote

"Oh, there you are, Honey! I was just staring at that pretty looking H&K USPc!"


Tried that.  Didn't work.  Had to throw myself on mercy of court.  Still in game, but playing with yellow card.   ;)  
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: BlueGrips on July 22, 2006, 11:40:52 PM
Richard: You meant sleeping on the couch!  :P
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Richard S on July 23, 2006, 09:48:09 AM
Fortunately for me, the couch is downstairs and she prefers to have her bodyguard nearby at night.   8)
Title: Re: HK45
Post by: Michigunner on July 23, 2006, 12:06:04 PM
BlueGrips,

That's one outstanding picture.  Thank's for sharing.

Bill