The Rohrbaugh Forum

Miscellaneous => Other Guns => Topic started by: Michigunner on May 05, 2006, 03:05:13 PM

Title: Failure to feed
Post by: Michigunner on May 05, 2006, 03:05:13 PM
My Sig P239 9mm has only fired 32 rounds of Federal 124 gr Hydra-Shok.

I decided to carry it to break in my new holster, and use as a backup for the R9S.   :D   It was mostly just to get used to having the P239 loaded.  It was not a "serious" carry.

Well, guess what?  I couldn't get the first round to load.  After about 5 tries, I switched to Golden Saber and finally got it in OK.

Next week, I'll put 200 rounds through it to reach a level of confidence.  I should not have assumed that Sigs never fail.

It looks like all pistols are subject to problems.  Darn!
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: R9SCarry on May 06, 2006, 03:57:13 PM
Bill - indeed almost any semi can have its probs.

I am interested tho to know the nature of that feed trouble.  

Quote
[size=13]I couldn't get the first round to load.[/size]

Can you describe what went on?  Would round come out of mag?  Was it failing to chamber, or go into battery?  Just trying to visualize out of interest' sake.
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: MountainMan on May 06, 2006, 11:25:48 PM
Went to a gun store today to play with some Sigs and 1911s.

The R9s does have me spoiled - they seems so large - even the Sig 239 and Kimber Ultra Carrys.  I thought the Sig 239 would be smaller than 229 but doesn't seem the case.
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Michigunner on May 06, 2006, 11:57:37 PM
Chris,

It barely came up from the magazine, and seemed to be rather level.  It was not anywhere near starting up the feed ramp.

Dave,

I'm lucky.  The P239 still seems small.  Of course, the HK USP .45 seems very large.  
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: R9SCarry on May 07, 2006, 10:04:52 AM
Hmmm - so Bill - when the feed process stopped what was the situation?  Slide ''jammed'' back and not able to go further forward?

If not as far as feed ramp for the round, then what happened if slide ''assisted'' fwd by hand pressure?  Or - any effect from ''sling-shotting"?

Strange indeed and sounding like a mag' issue in some ways.  Intriguing in fact so far!
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Michigunner on May 07, 2006, 10:30:29 AM
Chris,

The slide would not move forward.  I turned the pistol upside down, and pulled the slide back, and eventually the round fell out.

I thought it was the round, or else the magazine.  I have been cursed with Hydra-Shoks and in the past have had a specific round that that would not feed in any 9mm.

I'm going to concentrate on Golden Saber, Gold Dot, or Ranger LEO.

My Sig P239 barrel did receive the hard chrome treatment from Tripp Research.  I noticed that Teddy Jacobson recommended against doing the barrel, but too late for me.

I'll shoot 150 each of Golden Saber and Gold Dot next week.  If everything is flawless, it will go into service as a backup for my R9S.   :D

Bill
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Michigunner on May 07, 2006, 10:34:43 AM
I'm so glad you recommended belt holsters to me.  I've been using my 55Bn with great success.

At 3 o'clock it sits right under the arm and I feel very secure about concealment.

It is immensely more comfortable than IWB.

I feel a little dorky having a shirt out, but that is very common these days.  Guess everybody is carrying.  
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: MountainMan on May 07, 2006, 07:09:38 PM
Bill - how about a picture of that Sig and holster?
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Michigunner on May 07, 2006, 08:35:55 PM
Here it is.  I'm so sorry that the sun is going down, and the flash came on.  The hard chrome looks washed out, but it really is a nice satin.

(http://home.comcast.net/~michigunnerII/onlinestorage/55bn1.jpg)

(http://home.comcast.net/~michigunnerII/onlinestorage/55bn2.jpg)

(http://home.comcast.net/~michigunnerII/onlinestorage/both1.jpg)

(http://home.comcast.net/~michigunnerII/onlinestorage/sig1.jpg)

(http://home.comcast.net/~michigunnerII/onlinestorage/sig2.jpg)
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: MountainMan on May 07, 2006, 09:05:29 PM
Looks nice Bill - thanks!

Yesterday I looked at a SIG P239 SAS at a gun shop - the anti snag model.  Had wooden grips - don't know if I liked them as much as yours.

Is your frame alloy - I realize it is chromed.  
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Michigunner on May 07, 2006, 09:25:27 PM
Dave,

The frame is aluminum alloy.  Some metal finishers will not try to put hard chrome on aluminum.

Tripp Research put a polymer coating on the frame, and it is called Cobra Coat, I think.

The slide is hard chrome.

My big question about the snag-proof P239 you spoke about:  I don't know where the decocker is.

I probably should have left my pistol black, and it would be more stealhy in the black holster.
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: MountainMan on May 07, 2006, 09:37:48 PM
The article I have on the P239 SAS says there is no decocker - since I am a novice on SIGS I don't know if this is good or not.
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Michigunner on May 07, 2006, 09:46:18 PM
I guess it does not have a single action mode.

I've been wanting to get an HK USP .45 compact.  And almost ordered the other day.

Then, I realized that HK has a new model called HK45, which some people believe might become the next Army pistol.

My full size HK .45 can be carried "cocked and locked", but right now I don't have the courage to do it.
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: MountainMan on May 07, 2006, 09:50:37 PM
Bill - you're right it is double action - some type of DAK system I believe they call it.  The first shot is a long pull double action and the rest are shorter pull double actions.  Time to log off - have a good night.
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: R9SCarry on May 07, 2006, 10:27:34 PM
Bill - great to see the pics thx.  Tidy gun that.

Thx too for the further description - well sure sounds like a very significant prob and hope indeed that other ammo will be better, plus more break-in time.
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Larry on May 07, 2006, 10:36:54 PM
Bill, Just got a used 239.  Only shot it once.  I really like the SAS which is a DAO.  A lot of people like this trigger.  I personally like Sigs in native mode.  I want to try the DAK trigger though. I really love the S&W concealed hammer snubbies. Kinda like a high cap flatter wheel gun.  The 239 will accommodate the .40 or .357 sig barrel. However, even though you can feed each from the same mag, it is my understanding that you can have FTF's if you do not 'match' the mag to the barrel.  i.e., .357 orig.mag for .357 barrel.  Also, only original Sig mags seem to function reliably.  BTW, no need for decocker on the DAO's.  Larry
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Michigunner on May 07, 2006, 11:11:43 PM
Larry,

I really like the Sig P239.  It fits just right.  I had the Sig Short Trigger installed, so now it is easier to reach the trigger with short hands.

I came very close to buying the S&W 642 38 +P revolver.  It seems to be highly popular and well recommended.  I've been trying to trade my Bersa 380 and a Buckmark Camper for the 642, but nobody will go for it.

I just can't keep buying guns.  Of course, every single one has to have a new holster.  There is no end to it.

I bet you enjoy the revolvers.  At least, you know they will just about always fire OK.

Bill
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Larry on May 07, 2006, 11:32:33 PM
Bill: I had the 642 for a few yrs.  It had a polished satin finish then. I liked it better than the bead blast look now.  It wore Pachmyer's. Stock otherwise.  Great gun. Sold it and a raft of collectible good stuff when I got divorced some years back. I went to England for a couple yrs and so could not take anything there.  I had been living in NY, so gun related hassels abound there.  The 642 relegated my all time favorite to the safe, as I did not want to comprimise its collectable condition by continuing to carry. It was a Detective Spl. with factory Royal Blue and possibly the best action on any that I have tried.  Many people prefer Smiths. I just mostly had Colts.  My .22 Diamondback (also sold) was the best made revolver I ever shot. Also some custom work Single Action Colt revolvers.  I may very well get another 642 and have it tweaked.  Never saw another Colt snubby as nice as the one I had.  The scandium guns are tempting, but not controllable in my opinion.  My steel Colt was much more comfortable to shoot than even the 642.  I can only imagine the punishment from a scandium alloy .357!   Larry
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Aglifter on May 08, 2006, 01:16:34 AM
If you put the pachmeyer rubber grips on the scandiums, they aren't too bad -- not a match gun, but controllable...of course, I also like shooting (at least the first six rounds) of my 454 alaskan...
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Larry on May 08, 2006, 10:22:56 AM
Aglifter: Thanks for reply.  Would love to chat on Scandiums, etc. Probably time to switch to What Other Guns thread.    Larry
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Larry on May 08, 2006, 10:45:23 AM
Aglifter- I went to "HELP S&W 340PD......thread.   Larry
Title: Re: Failure to feed
Post by: Michigunner on May 15, 2006, 08:37:35 AM
I shot 109 rounds through the Sig P239.  They were Golden Saber 124 gr +P.

It worked perfectly.  Confidence is very high now, so it is a suitable backup for my R9S.   :)

I keep pulling my shirt tail down each time when getting out of a chair.  Probably just need to forget about it being there.