The Rohrbaugh Forum

Rohrbaugh Products and Accessories => Rohrbaugh R9 (all variations) => Topic started by: Douglas on September 03, 2011, 01:04:25 AM

Title: Introduction
Post by: Douglas on September 03, 2011, 01:04:25 AM: Hello all!

I've been a member here, under the shortened form of my name, since '09. But...I forgot my password, and have a new e-mail address since then, so I simply re-registered in order to post.

I finally joined the club. I picked up a Stealth R9S from a buddy at work, at what I consider a steal. I haven't had the chance to shoot it yet. He was carrying 147g Hydra Shoks in it and they functioned fine.

I also prefer 147s, but I have the 115g Gold Dots in it now just because of the recommendations. I got them, plus some 147 Gold Dots and some 115g WWB to try out.

From Rohrbaugh I ordered: 4 recoil springs (-Maria explained that their power is still out from hurricane Irene, so...) a Nemesis holster for the short term and some grip screws in case I strip them and a nice hex wrench to keep 'em tight off Amazon. Also I was in touch with Lisa at Hedley holsters to order an RB.

It took a couple of days to get used to the small size of the pup, I borrowed it for five days with the eye towards deciding if I wanted it. Days one and two I was figuring out how to tell my buddy that I didn't like it. ...From day three on I suddenly got it.

Anyway, I'm glad to be here, and here's a quick and dirty pic of the Rohrbaugh with some of my other small hardware.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v111/tortoise/guns.jpg)
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: yankee2500 on September 03, 2011, 01:26:19 AM: Douglas, Welcome and congrats on the Stealth. I prefer the
124 gr and 147gr to the 115s myself and my pup likes anything.
Your other guns look like a common progression to the pup, a Glock and a J frame ;D
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: Douglas on September 03, 2011, 01:54:11 AM: Quote
Douglas, Welcome and congrats on the Stealth. I prefer the
124 gr and 147gr to the 115s myself and my pup likes anything.
Your other guns look like a common progression to the pup, a Glock and a J frame ;D

Thank you, and it's good to hear on the 147's.

Yeah, you're probably right. I had a S&W 640 sixteen, seventeen years ago; carried it as a back up. The G26 came out and it seemed like a no-brainer: eleven rounds compared to five, I could feed it from my mag pouches, twice the barrel length/sight radius... I mean, come on! So I traded the 640. But the 26 never carried off duty like the J.

I really like it. I shoot great with it. And I carry it a lot, but...

So I grabbed a 642, but honestly, in this day and age, 5 rounds with a speed strip reload is just not enough.

I'm not looking for an absolutely defensive gun. I may have to engage, not just evac. It's not just about protecting me and mine. At the absolute minimum, I'm looking to be able to double tap three bad guys, with an extra or a miss.

-And that's the seven rounds in an "all-the-time" R9.
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: Richard S on September 03, 2011, 08:43:18 AM: Douglas:

Permit me also to congratulate you on your R9 and echo what John said.

I used to load 147-grain Golden Sabers in my R9, under the "throw-a-bigger-rock" theory, and never had any problems with the load. I dropped back to the 124-grain round only because I started carrying my HK P7 as a primary and learned that Hechler & Koch had designed the P7's gas-retarded recoil system around 115/124-grain ammunition. It became a pain in the backside trying to keep the ammo straight during cleaning time.

Good luck with your new R9.
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: kjtrains on September 03, 2011, 09:51:38 AM: Douglas. Welcome and congrats on getting the Stealth. I'm sure you've been reading the Forum and know there's a lot of info here. Do enjoy! :)
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: Douglas on September 03, 2011, 10:38:51 AM: Quote

... It became a pain in the backside trying to keep the ammo straight during cleaning time...

I had the digital scale out about ninety seconds after I opened the box of 147g Gold Dots. -Or was it the 115s.

Wait.

This was a 147g. I think. Right?

Oh crap. ;D

Thanks for the welcome Richard and kj!
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: xaman on September 03, 2011, 10:52:34 AM: Welcome, and congrats on your pup.

I also appreciatete your sentiments concerning 7rounds in an "all-the-time" R9, my thoughts exactly.
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: theirishguard on September 03, 2011, 12:20:22 PM: Douglas, Congrat on the Stealth, you'll never look back. Enjoy it here and good shooting, I go with 124 GD. Tom
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: backupr9 on September 03, 2011, 06:22:54 PM: Some here have recommended loading only 6 rounds because a preponderance of the failure to feed issues have apparently occurred with the second round from a fully loaded magazine (6 in the magazine and one chambered). Comments? Anyone?
John

ps: Welcome to the forum from another relative newby!
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: Douglas on September 03, 2011, 07:38:03 PM: Hey John, thanks for the welcome.

For my money, I don't download magazines. If I end up finding that I can't carry it full, I'll chalk it up as a failed experiment and move on.

I remember my Dad, a lifer, talking about downloading M16 magazines because they didn't feed right. That's forty years ago.

Today I use mostly Magpuls in my AR and it's not an issue.

It's a big leap of faith to go out on the cutting edge of firearms tech when it's not for sport. For the two extra rounds, and a reasonable expectation of a (somewhat) faster reload, I've picked the R9 over the J frame.

For just one extra? I think I'd go back to five-for-sure at contact distance and live with the speed strip.

YMMV. :)
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: backupr9 on September 03, 2011, 08:55:02 PM: I do fully load my AR also...with the newer magazines and better weapons it doesn't seem to make a difference. I have never had a problem with fully loaded R9 magazines, but suspect that you should, as I'm sure you do, vet each magazine individually as to performance and trustworthiness.
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: Douglas on September 03, 2011, 09:02:42 PM: A good cop does what, before using their equipment in the field?

-They test it?

They test it.
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: tracker on September 03, 2011, 09:30:40 PM: Excuse me?
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: Douglas on September 03, 2011, 09:35:43 PM: Quote
Excuse me?

Not a Super Troopers fan then, I guess? ;D

Quote
... but suspect that you should, as I'm sure you do, vet each magazine individually as to performance and trustworthiness.
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: Richard S on September 03, 2011, 10:24:46 PM: Quote
Some here have recommended loading only 6 rounds because a preponderance of the failure to feed issues have apparently occurred with the second round from a fully loaded magazine (6 in the magazine and one chambered). Comments? Anyone?
John

ps: Welcome to the forum from another relative newby!

I'm one of the few around here who "downloads" magazines by one round, but it is just due to habit left over from the 1960s. Metallurgy and spring technology have come light years since then. But I'm what you might call "old school," and old habits die hard. ;)
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: tracker on September 03, 2011, 11:21:04 PM: So do Super Troopers.
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: Reinz on September 04, 2011, 01:59:06 AM: Hey Douglas, welcome "Meow"!
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: Douglas on September 04, 2011, 10:25:13 AM: ;D

Thank you, and a virtual keg of St. Anky to you sir.
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: DDGator on September 04, 2011, 07:19:47 PM: A couple images were pulled -- it's just better this way. Sorry if anyone was offended by either the inclusion or deletion!
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: Douglas on September 04, 2011, 09:03:13 PM: I'm here five minutes, and look what happens... :-X

Bad seed. Story of my life!

;)
Title: Re: Introduction
Post by: kjtrains on September 04, 2011, 10:51:18 PM: No harm done! Hang in there! :)