The Rohrbaugh Forum

Miscellaneous => The Water Cooler -- General Discussions => Topic started by: MRC on July 01, 2013, 02:09:00 PM

Title: An ad for used Aston Martins
Post by: MRC on July 01, 2013, 02:09:00 PM
A guy has to appreciate this.


(http://)
Title: Re: An ad for used Aston Martins
Post by: BlueC2 on July 01, 2013, 02:31:49 PM
damn near fell out of my chair
Title: Re: An ad for used Aston Martins
Post by: sslater on July 01, 2013, 08:39:44 PM
Pretty classy.  Shows nothing but activates the imagination, eh? 
Damn near bumped my nose on the monitor before I remembered to spin that little wheel on my mouse.  8)
Title: Re: An ad for used Aston Martins
Post by: tracker on July 01, 2013, 08:44:53 PM
One of the main differences is that the previously owned AM can be purchased with an extended warranty and has a residual resale value.
Title: Re: An ad for used Aston Martins
Post by: wildmanwill on July 01, 2013, 10:29:47 PM
I call fake or phony.  Typo - should be pre-owned, not pre-owed.  I doubt that they would have let that through and get published.  There is also an extra space before the question mark, but that could be a regional difference.
Title: Re: An ad for used Aston Martins
Post by: tracker on July 01, 2013, 11:07:26 PM
Just a little fun and not too serious; many ex-husbands, however, would agree with the "pre owed" scenario.
Title: Re: An ad for used Aston Martins
Post by: MRC on July 02, 2013, 07:39:50 AM
I call fake or phony.  Typo - should be pre-owned, not pre-owed.  I doubt that they would have let that through and get published.  There is also an extra space before the question mark, but that could be a regional difference.


  ...but do you really care ?
Title: Re: An ad for used Aston Martins
Post by: Richard S on July 02, 2013, 10:17:36 AM
* * * many ex-husbands, however, would agree with the "pre owed" scenario.

And the choir of former plaintiffs said "Amen"!   ;D
Title: Re: An ad for used Aston Martins
Post by: wildmanwill on July 02, 2013, 10:20:53 AM
I call fake or phony.  Typo - should be pre-owned, not pre-owed.  I doubt that they would have let that through and get published.  There is also an extra space before the question mark, but that could be a regional difference.


  ...but do you really care ?

I work in a related field, so that sort of stuff "pops out" at me.  ;)