Author Topic: Got an R9s, Can't Decide . . .  (Read 4307 times)

Offline rtohio

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Got an R9s, Can't Decide . . .
« Reply #15 on: February 03, 2006, 10:55:43 PM »
I like the rudimentary sights on the R9S and would have selected it if both had been presented, but my dealer only had the R9S. I find the gun amazingly accurate so far and manageable to shoot (not like my Scandium 357). I miss Tritrium sights like are on my Kahr PM40 and my Scandium (which has CTs also). The assist at night would be helpful and I am waiting for someone to come up with a minature Tritrium if only for the front.

RTOhio

Offline Brenden

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1747
  • Farmie!!!
Re: Got an R9s, Can't Decide . . .
« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2006, 02:07:34 AM »
rtohio,

Welcome to the forum..

In the pup-we have a shot at arms length- 9mm.. ;)

I feel very good with the sights that are available..IMO.. ;D

Welcome again..

Brenden
« Last Edit: February 04, 2006, 02:43:03 AM by Brenden »
NRA Life Patron Member
GOA
Molon Labe

Offline bluegun

  • Sharpshooter
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: Got an R9s, Can't Decide . . .
« Reply #17 on: February 04, 2006, 02:00:11 PM »
i agree with sslater and other posters, these little guys point very quickly and naturally.  i'd be interested in reading an article / post on the ergonomics of pistols, what makes some good and others not so good.  'course, a lot of it depends on the individual shooter's "mitt" size and shape . . . there's got to be some common science to the development of gun shapes though.

sure like rohrbaughs' approach

Offline R9SCarry

  • Grand Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2657
  • Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
Re: Got an R9s, Can't Decide . . .
« Reply #18 on: February 04, 2006, 09:35:55 PM »
True enough - hand dimensions are in some ways the deciding factor.  But needless to say - a gun has to be made based on that elusive ''Mr Average'' - plus compromize with regard to its intended purpose.

With the R9 we have everything geared to small for pocket - and yet the ability to handle a full 9mm.  Quite a feat.  Compromize there has meant keeping every aspect as small as possible and yet permit 6+1 capacity.

One of the biggest factors with guns IMO is barrel axis - when it comes to controllability in use-  Obviously the lower that axis the better - but then we have to place a trigger where it can be used with ease, plus a grip - and so the compromize begins!

The Mateba self loading revo possibly has the best barrel axis as that is low - about as low as any gun ever got.  Almost everything else by default has that axis high enough to make for muzzle flip.

Much appraisal of a gun is subjective - back to hand sizes etc - and strength even in some cases.  The Glock grip angle is disliked by some - I am not over keen tho can shoot a Glock well.  For others, the 1911 angle is best.  Then revo's - well - whole heap of variation there with grip size and angle.Even for me too - grip width - I love the wide double stack feel of my SIG - for others they find it too fat!!

The pup being small is innately IMO very pointable - and being short helps that.  Try to point as quick with a 6" barrelled revo - it is not quite so easy I think.

Finally tho - regardless of how right or not the designers have succeeded in a particular example - the ultimate requirement is for the owner/shooter to familiarize - both with feel, balance and, the manual of arms.
Chris - R9S
Guns don't kill people - people kill people.
R9 FAQ Site
NRA Life member and Certified Instructor.