I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I've always wondered why Rohrbaugh doesn't loosen up some of the tolerances a bit?
I know this is probably an apples to oranges thing, but some extremely tight 1911's don't function worth a damn, yet the rattle traps work come hell or high water.
While the R9 shouldn't be a rattle-trap, opening it up a couple thousandths could make a huge difference as far as reliability goes and it may not need such a regiment on lubrication.
I only make these observations after reading about the various failures experienced with new guns and the break-in needed. It appears that friction has a larger than normal influence on the R9's due to the tight tolerances (hence the bible on correct & copious lubrication).
Finally, could break-in with the R9's be taking longer than normal due to the extensive amount of grease needed? I'm not talking about running the gun dry and galling the metal, but Glock seems to have a good thing going with the copper flaked lube they include from the factory. Seems that 50-100rds fired with that stuff really makes everything smooth out & gel together.
I understand the R9 is like nothing else on the market and I’m sure someone will quickly give me a spanking for thinking outside the box, so “flame-suit” on! Just kicking the tires & trying to figure this little pup out!
