My reason for believing that stronger magazine springs are necessary is that just about every malfunction I had resulted in the bullet that should have gone into the chamber stuck partially in the magazine at a high upward angle, and in one case vertical. This is the symptom of the slide moving forward before the magazine spring can push the next round in front of the slide.
Additionally, using non-recommended but standard pressure 9mm 135 gr. Federal Personal Defense, the rounds chambered every single time when I manually cycled the slide. With sufficient time for the magazine spring to do its job before the slide moves forward, even non-recommended ammo will feed. This tells me that Rohrbaugh has the potential to really decrease the ammo sensitivity and increase reliability with this change.
Based on what I saw at the range, I will guess at least 10% extra power is needed.
I checked the Wolff website, and didn't see any Rohrbaugh springs at all.
Something like this shouldn't be "extra power" on a gun costing $1,100. It should be "standard."